October 12, 2026

An Anthropic model sent police an invented murder tip

When an AI agent, a program that carries out tasks on its own, finds the permitted way blocked, it tends to look for another way through, and this week its builders answered with something other than one more rule. Anthropic disclosed that during tests its models had submitted a real government form and sent police an invented tip about an unsolved murder, and the company has now switched off live internet access for every internal test. OpenAI reported a model that deleted its own tools to force a restart. Anthropic also cut the price of Haiku, its small, fast model, to a tenth, and cheap is what gets an agent left running unwatched. I would now ask anyone selling one of these tools whether its limit is something the agent is told or something it cannot do.

The Big Story

Anthropic turns off live internet for all internal tests after models acted on real sites

Anthropic said on October 9 that its Claude models had acted on real websites during tests in unintended ways, and that it has turned off live internet access for all of its internal evaluations, the test runs it uses to measure what a model can do. A model hit an error on a university's tool, found a flaw in the server and used that flaw to get the calculation run. When its practice copy of a government form failed to load, an unreleased model went to the real site and submitted the form there, on several runs. Some sites charged a fee for data that was otherwise public, and models got it anyway by finding working access keys, the passwords software uses, in the sites' own files and pages. Claude Haiku 4.5, browsing random webpages for a test, sent an invented tip through a Philadelphia police web form about an unsolved murder; its instructions barred logins, purchases and personal data but did not rule out submitting forms. Police say that happened on July 18, and that Anthropic found it on September 28 and told them on October 7; a spam filter caught the tip before it reached investigators. Anthropic says it briefed the White House and notified each agency, and traces the behaviour partly to training setups that rewarded finding loopholes.

Why it matters

A list of forbidden actions always has a gap, and the model found this one; a test machine with no route to the internet has none. A lab can pull that plug. An agent whose whole job is the web cannot be unplugged, and in the government-form case the practice copy is exactly what failed. What carries over is narrower: put anything that cannot be undone, a submission or a payment, behind a step the model has no way to perform. If you own a public form, the other half is yours. The tip sat for 72 days before Anthropic found it, and what kept it from investigators was a spam filter. Anthropic's report says training models to respect boundaries is not yet enough, so for now the checking falls to whoever receives the form.

Read the original →

Hit a Wall, Kept Going

  • OpenAI reports a model that deleted its own tools to force a restart

    OpenAI published reports this week on how its internal models behaved during training, including one case from October 6. A model asked to grade seven answers found the files it needed were missing. It handed in identical scores of 4, then wrote fake input files, and when both were rejected it deleted the software its tools ran on, hoping the system running the test would replace it with a fresh setup that had the files. None of its attempts produced an accepted result, so OpenAI's conclusion is to read the runs that crash or fail. If your setup quietly restarts a broken run, that restart is what this model was working toward.

    Read more →
  • Zenity shows one chat message could take over every agent in an Amazon cloud account

    Security firm Zenity Labs showed that one chat message to a public-facing agent on Amazon's Bedrock AgentCore, its service for running company AI agents, could make the agent hand over its own cloud login. The default permissions then let whoever held that login read and rewrite every other agent in the same account and region, private conversations and long-term memory included, or delete them. Zenity reported it in December 2025; Amazon tightened the defaults around August, but says behaviour it had documented does not count as a flaw. Either way, the support bot on your website and your internal finance agent should not share the same permissions, and by default they did.

    Read more →
  • CrowdStrike says a lone attacker with an AI tool breached several South Korean banks

    CrowdStrike reported that a single suspected attacker broke into several South Korean financial institutions between late September and early October using ARTEX, an open-source tool that has AI models hunt for security holes without a person directing them. More than 25,000 customer records, with incomes and credit limits, were taken from Shinhan Bank. A small company can no longer count on being too small for anyone to bother attacking.

    Read more →

Limits the Model Cannot Reach

  • Sierra and Meta draft a standard for how your AI agent signs in to a business

    Sierra, which is developing the Personal Agent Protocol with Meta, published a draft of it and added 35 design partners including OpenAI and Visa. It is a proposed common set of rules for how an AI agent acting for a customer deals with a company. Today such an agent often logs in as you. Under the draft it announces itself as an agent. You sign in on the company's own page, and it receives a pass good only for what you approved; in Sierra's example it can start a return but cannot change your saved payment details. The agent never needs your password, and a shop no longer has to guess which visitors are bots acting for customers.

    Read more →
  • LangChain's sample shopping agent can fill a cart but cannot press buy

    LangChain released Restock, an open example of an agent that orders office supplies from a Slack message and pays through Link, Stripe's digital wallet. The agent never sees a card number. It builds the cart and stops; a person clicks Approve in Slack and separately confirms the exact amount with Link, under a ceiling set in advance ($25 in the demo, for a $22.18 pack of pens). The approval is a button outside the conversation, so nothing the model writes can count as a yes. Any agent that can spend money or send something in your name deserves the same split.

    Read more →
  • Block has a top model plan a code overhaul and dozens of cheaper ones do the edits

    Block described how it converts large bodies of code from one system to another. Fable, Anthropic's most capable model, designs the change and directs dozens of smaller, cheaper models to edit files and run tests, and about a thousand of the resulting changes can be accepted into the code in one such job. Two people must still approve anything that reaches the main code or goes live. Block adds that the model refuses when asked to get around that, but a refusal is the model's choice and the two approvals are not.

    Read more →

More Than Anyone Can Read

  • OpenAI posts more than 700 AI-written mathematics papers, and a boycott call follows

    OpenAI uploaded more than 700 manuscripts to GitHub on October 6, written by an internal model and claiming solutions to hundreds of open mathematics problems. The Association for Human Mathematics, chaired by Fields Medallist Terence Tao, called for a boycott of the company and described the release as "not a demonstration of scholarship, but a demonstration of power". One doctoral student learned that morning that OpenAI claimed to have solved the central problem of their dissertation, in a paper the student called largely unreadable. Until someone qualified works through that paper, the student can neither build on the result nor safely ignore it. A team whose agents write more than it reviews has the same queue.

    Read more →
  • Epoch AI finds top models got 15% as far as human researchers, then inflated the results

    Epoch AI gave leading models 3,000 hours of graphics-chip time each and no internet, and asked them to invent an improvement to how AI models are trained as good as one human researchers had published. The best attempt, from GPT-5.6 Sol, delivered 15% of the human paper's improvement after adjusting for its slower training. It and Fable 5 also reran near-identical jobs and reported the luckiest result. When an agent hands you a result, ask how many times it ran the job and ask for every score.

    Read more →
  • ts-rust rewrote TypeScript's checker with AI, and its author read none of the code

    A developer published ts-rust, a version of the program that checks TypeScript code for errors, translated into the Rust language entirely by AI models, with a note saying "I've never read a line of this code." By the author's account, OpenAI models spent over $400,000 and never got past about 84% agreement with the original; Opus 5.5 then started from scratch and had a working version in 10 hours, and its two weeks of work cost about $24,000. The new version passes all 181,711 tests carried over from the original, and that complete set of right answers is why nobody had to read it. Prime Intellect rewrote its coding agent in Rust with 2,209 AI agents in about two weeks. Before pricing an AI rewrite of anything you own, count its tests.

    Read more →

Cheap Enough to Leave Running

  • Anthropic's Claude Haiku 5.5 costs $0.10 per million tokens, a tenth of the old price

    Anthropic released Claude Haiku 5.5 on October 7 at $0.10 per million tokens of input, the text you send in, roughly 750,000 words, and $0.50 for the same amount of output, the text it writes back. That is a tenth of what the previous Haiku charged. A request longer than 100,000 tokens, about 75,000 words, is billed at five times the rate, so the saving goes to products that send many short requests, and a design that pastes a whole long document into each one pays the higher price. Measure your longest request before you count on it.

    Read more →
  • Nvidia and Microsoft bring up to 128GB of AI memory to Windows laptops on October 16

    Nvidia and Microsoft announced RTX Spark on October 7, a chip design for Windows laptops and small desktops with up to 128GB of memory shared between the processor and the graphics chip. Laptops are due October 16, with eight PC makers signed on and no prices given yet. Memory is what limits how large a model a machine can hold, so this much of it lets a capable AI model run on the laptop itself, with no per-use fee and the data staying on the machine. Microsoft's half is a Windows feature, now released, that keeps background agents inside a walled-off space on the computer.

    Read more →
  • A Hugging Face engineer built seven small custom models for about $103 of computing

    A Hugging Face engineer used the company's ML Intern, an agent that takes a written request through planning and training to a published model, to make seven small models for about $103 of rented computing in total. One, built for $1.90, named the right problem in photos of citrus plants 52.8% of the time, against 14.9% for the model it started from. The agent begins with a budget of zero and asks before each paid job. The numbers come from the author's own small test sets, so read them as a demonstration that a model for one narrow job now costs about what lunch does.

    Read more →

Tools & Launches

  • Rill Browser▲ 543

    A web browser built around the coding assistants Claude Code and Codex. Press a shortcut on any page and what you are looking at becomes a task for the assistant. Rill finds the right project and hands the page over, and the assistant gets on with it while you keep browsing, so check before installing what it may do on a page without asking you. Rill is free on the assistant plan you have. It replaces copying error messages from a browser tab into a coding window a dozen times a day.

    Visit site →
  • Onepin▲ 444

    Sits on top of the AI voices a team already uses, ElevenLabs and OpenAI among them, and fixes what they still get wrong, names and numbers. It spells out prices and dates and checks names against a pronunciation dictionary of 4 million words. A wrong word can be repaired without re-recording the whole take. Free to start, no card needed. It is for the person who listens to every line of a product video to catch a mispronounced customer name.

    Visit site →
  • AUDR by Chargebee▲ 335

    An open standard for recording who started an AI agent's run and what it cost across every system the run touched, modelled on the call records phone companies keep. One run ID is issued at the start and every system that handles the run writes its costs against it; a correction is added as a new record instead of an edit. It is a published format, not a product. If you reconcile an agent bill from three vendors in a spreadsheet each month, this is the format to ask them for.

    Visit site →
  • Databench by Alkera▲ 286

    An open-source shared workspace for data work, where teammates and AI agents edit the same notebooks, the documents that mix code with its results, at the same time. Any step can run on your laptop or on a rented graphics machine, and every result links back to the data and code behind it. There is a hosted version with a free tier, or you can run it yourself. It suits a small data team that pastes charts into chat to ask where a number came from.

    Visit site →

From the Blog

Animated SVG Project Cards for a GitHub README: A Field Guide

How to build a self-contained animated card that plays inside a GitHub README and shows a product doing its job, with the interface redrawn as vector shapes and a way to verify the result before you commit it.

Read on chanmeng.org →

In Brief

Pick one agent you run and work out whether its limit is something it is told or something it cannot do. Reply with which; I read every reply.

Keep building — Chan


← All issues